Planner or pantser? How much of each?

I have to ask - have you ever planned anything? I mean, anything! When the mood takes you you've just gotta get it down, no? Splurge. Get the characters moving, get your thoughts down and giddily twisting until you find out what you want to say.

What about nights out, holidays? What bit's planned? What bit do you allow to just wow you with its minute-by-minute magic.

Some people call themselves PLANNERS. They love to plan it all out - nth degree - holidays, romances, life, rigid all the way...

In writing the opposite gets called PANTSERS (seat of your pants writers). Let's just sit at the desk and let that suff flow. No plan, no direction, just waiting for the muse...

I don't know about you but I don't want a holiday with either extreme. I like to plan some things - let's head towards New York, let's get there for the 4th July. But other things can just come - let's see who we meet on the beach.

That's my planner vs pantser writing tip right there. Plan the things you can plan. Feel your way through the things that will just pop into your head because you've been stoking the fire.

Yes, you need to plan something. For a start, you should decide where you're going.

So for example, if you've got at least a sense of an ending then you can work out all sorts of things, style, characters, a few of the ups and downs. So what's going to be the high-point climactic, wow ending. Are you going for a romantic ending - a horror ending - an underdog victorious ending - a 'who'd have thought it' mystery revealed… If it's an essay - how are you going to nail that punchy last sentence?

Once you’ve got that - hey - it’s the start of a plan. When you start pantsing from the beginning you at least know where you’re going. Maybe there’s some more we can do with this...

Comments

John Collier's The Chaser: Is it the perfect short fairy tale?

If someone asks for a perfect short fairy tale I've just got to sit them down for four minutes to read The Chaser by John Collier. In just over 1000 words, The Chaser tells the story of a lovesick young dweeb hunting for magic means to win the poor unfortunate object of his obsessions. He'll get what he deserves, oh yes, but only at the tragic expense inflicted on what he claims to love. The Chaser has that wonderful, punchy anecdotal quality that makes it immediately engaging - the style of fairy tale yarn is so deceptively simple that it could be appear in your kid sister's bedtime stories. But The Chaser, for me, also tells a vast human truth in its very few words. It's about love and how we fool ourselves, how our emotions get the better of us. Comedy and pathos, the contrast of wise age and callow youth... cruelty disguised as philanthropy or love. It's worth the four minute read just for these clever contrasts. It makes you think beyond the read though. One

The best things that books are best at.. #1 the ah of course moment (retrospective realisation)

Come on, books are brilliant at all sorts of things. Better than films, better than dreams and certainly better than real life. Or have I got that wrong? Anyway. Sometimes I'm lying on the grass and something hits me - a kind of "so that's why books are so amazing!" To celebrate these occasional moments and to share them out to see whether you agree, I'm going to collect them as they happen. Here's the first inspired thought... Books are best at.... retrospective realisation Lovely phrase, eh? I just made it up. I think. This is that moment when you have to cast your mind back - way back - to the beginning of the novel even - and only then does something (everything?!?) make sense. It's a wonderful thing. You may have had a an eight-hour read and then something just twigs - ah, of course . And it was planted at the back of your mind without you even realising it, ages, ages long ago. When it fires, you get new understanding - a buried brain cell elec

Books that make you laugh and cry - writers tip on wringing out emotions

Have you heard that phrase "Make em laugh, make em cry make them wait"? I've looked it up and there's a few different people are supposed to have said it first. Most convincingly Charles Reade as quoted in: The Chautauquan , Volume 36, p. 161, in 1903), - hey, scholarship for literature students. I'm feeling smug! Let's think what it means though. What it really means. Your writing is trying to generate an emotion. If the words you've got down aren't generating an emotion - or preparing for it - then they're not doing the right job. Look at the blurbs for the really successful books - even more for films. They promise that you'll get a massive overload of feeling. You'll laugh until your stomach aches. You'll cry buckets. You'll be too frightened to turn off the lights to sleep. Even books that claim to be more 'intellectual' are prodding at emotions - you'll feel proud to have understood this tangled and tricky b

Big fat heaps of writing tips

Search This Blog