Genre - genre - what the hell does 'genre' do?

Genre. I've heard it pronounced in totally weird ways (Like the girl in Atonement does) and, yes, there's going to be some sneering when it's said.

'Genre.' Well, of course you're not supposed to be so easily pigeon-holed are you. Gotta be more slippery, difficult to pin, a fox evading traps. Genre just puts you in a box.

Let's look at it another way though. Genre isn't a box, it's a signpost.

Genre is the sign you're looking for when you're thinking - shall I go there?

Genre is like a neighbourhood. Pitch dark alley with red neon signs. A waterfront with palms. A library with a secret doorway. Where do you want to go?

I need to make a sign. And the sign needs to suit the neighbourhood.

People who want the turquoise coast and palms don’t want to end up fighting mobsters down grizzly alley.

Yes, yes, there are people who want their dark alley to have palms and a beach at the bottom. But there aren’t so many of them and they’re hard to find.

If you want people to come to your neighbourhood, then you need to be able to give it a clear signpost. You need your reader to trust that signpost. Your reader needs to feel, when they get there, that it was so totally the right decision.

I like palms and beach. You said you’d take me there - and, hey, this is the best palms and beach I’ve ever been to…

So now they’re happy you can add that extra. But it’s not the main deal. You’ve given them the palms and the beach and they’ve had a swim in the sea. As they’re drying off then maybe there’s a little alley off behind the rocks over there, and a neon sign.

Is there more to this genre thing than I thought…? What is it that makes something a genre?

(And btw you pronounce it dz-on-rr-uh - ideally with a slight French accent)

Comments

John Collier's The Chaser: Is it the perfect short fairy tale?

If someone asks for a perfect short fairy tale I've just got to sit them down for four minutes to read The Chaser by John Collier. In just over 1000 words, The Chaser tells the story of a lovesick young dweeb hunting for magic means to win the poor unfortunate object of his obsessions. He'll get what he deserves, oh yes, but only at the tragic expense inflicted on what he claims to love. The Chaser has that wonderful, punchy anecdotal quality that makes it immediately engaging - the style of fairy tale yarn is so deceptively simple that it could be appear in your kid sister's bedtime stories. But The Chaser, for me, also tells a vast human truth in its very few words. It's about love and how we fool ourselves, how our emotions get the better of us. Comedy and pathos, the contrast of wise age and callow youth... cruelty disguised as philanthropy or love. It's worth the four minute read just for these clever contrasts. It makes you think beyond the read though. One

The best things that books are best at.. #1 the ah of course moment (retrospective realisation)

Come on, books are brilliant at all sorts of things. Better than films, better than dreams and certainly better than real life. Or have I got that wrong? Anyway. Sometimes I'm lying on the grass and something hits me - a kind of "so that's why books are so amazing!" To celebrate these occasional moments and to share them out to see whether you agree, I'm going to collect them as they happen. Here's the first inspired thought... Books are best at.... retrospective realisation Lovely phrase, eh? I just made it up. I think. This is that moment when you have to cast your mind back - way back - to the beginning of the novel even - and only then does something (everything?!?) make sense. It's a wonderful thing. You may have had a an eight-hour read and then something just twigs - ah, of course . And it was planted at the back of your mind without you even realising it, ages, ages long ago. When it fires, you get new understanding - a buried brain cell elec

Books that make you laugh and cry - writers tip on wringing out emotions

Have you heard that phrase "Make em laugh, make em cry make them wait"? I've looked it up and there's a few different people are supposed to have said it first. Most convincingly Charles Reade as quoted in: The Chautauquan , Volume 36, p. 161, in 1903), - hey, scholarship for literature students. I'm feeling smug! Let's think what it means though. What it really means. Your writing is trying to generate an emotion. If the words you've got down aren't generating an emotion - or preparing for it - then they're not doing the right job. Look at the blurbs for the really successful books - even more for films. They promise that you'll get a massive overload of feeling. You'll laugh until your stomach aches. You'll cry buckets. You'll be too frightened to turn off the lights to sleep. Even books that claim to be more 'intellectual' are prodding at emotions - you'll feel proud to have understood this tangled and tricky b

Big fat heaps of writing tips

Search This Blog